The Smithsonian effort was aĭirect collaborative effort of the libraries, archives, museums, and information technology staff that generated new pathwaysįor collaboration between. Web 2.0 audience of Flickr the Smithsonian Institution was the fourth member of the Commons. The Flickr Commons was created as a forum for institutions to share their rich photographic collections with the emerging The study concludes with some discussion and implications for instructional designers and practitioners. This paper argues that social technologies are valuable tools in the language classrooms but entail challenges regarding their theoretical and pedagogical alignment. Findings of this study delineate how Web 2.0 tools are utilized in CALL and capitalize Web 2.0 features employed for different types of pedagogical activities. Acquisition theories that guide their use (3) skills that Web 2.0 technologies support (4) reported advantages and challenges in harnessing Web 2.0 tools and (5) task design considerations. Published research manuscripts related to the use of Web 2.0 tools in CALL have been explored, and the following research foci have been determined: (1) Web 2.0 tools that dominate second/foreign language classroom (2) learning/Second Language. This study explores the research development pertaining to the use of Web 2.0 technologies in the field of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Originality/value – Unlike earlier proposals for a definition of the notion Library 2.0, the present study presents an empirical and consensual crowd-sourcing approach of defining the concept Library 2.0 and provides basis for discussing the future evolution of the notion and its implications for library and information science research and library practices. Practical implications – A comprehensive model enables both researchers and practitioners to frame the phenomenon more clearly, evaluate existing and planned services and their proximity to what is Library 2.0. Research limitations/implications – The model provides a basis for framing Library 2.0 as a research object and to map central themes of future research. of Library 2.0, containing seven building-blocks of the phenomenon: interactivity, users, participation, libraries and library services, web and web 2.0, social aspects, and technology and tools. Findings – The study resulted in a model. Design/methodology/approach – Written answers to the question “What is Library 2.0?” given by practitioners and researchers (n=29) interested in Library 2.0 issues were analyzed by using co-word analysis to map the underlying elements of the concept. Purpose – The aim of this paper is to define both theoretically and empirically the concept of Library 2.0. Duolingo also incorporates web 2.0 community collaboration features in the fields of crowd-sourced translations and developing new language learning materials, whilst these features are unavailable on the uTalk platform. Whilst Duolingo focusses on approximately 30, uTalk boasts of more than 130. Another important difference is the number of languages each app offers.
Utalk language examples free#
Duolingo is free of charge whereas utalk is available for a small fee in app format, or for an annual fee for an institutional license, which is uniquely delivered via the Shibboleth library system, making administration very easy.
Tutors are able to set up virtual classrooms and assign homework to learners in Duolingo for Schools, whilst the tutor tools available for utalk are basic, but currently under development. In terms of tutor tools, Duolingo is far more sophisticated than uTalk.
Utalk language examples Pc#
They are both available on all major PC and mobile platforms and offer learning materials that address the four skills, at least to some extent, and incorporate elements of gamification.
Although there are similarities between the two apps, there are important differences which this paper will highlight. This paper will compare the two products with reference to Rosell-Aguilar's (2017: 253) framework, which includes criteria for consideration under the four following sub-headings: Language Learning, Pedagogy, User Experience and Technology. Two of the many products available include Eurotalk, recently rebranded as uTalk, and Duolingo. IWLP tutors often recommend students specific digital resources to support their learning.
0 kommentar(er)
